Feature Snacks
Feature Kibble
Tiny request. Massive chew time.
Plain English: Small feature requests often expand through edge cases, approvals, review loops, and unclear acceptance criteria.
What this snack represents
Tiny request. Massive chew time. For requirements that arrive small and leave wearing platform shoes.
Plain English: Small feature requests often expand through edge cases, approvals, review loops, and unclear acceptance criteria.
Formula: 30m clarification + 3h build + 1h review + 1h QA + 30m rework
What this teaches: Scope Creep, Acceptance Criteria, Hidden Work.
Why teams underestimate it
The shelf label works because the cost is usually hidden across clarification, review, context switching, QA, and follow-up decisions. BarkBowl makes those ingredients visible before the work is treated as free.
Time formula
30m clarification + 3h build + 1h review + 1h QA + 30m rework
Worked example
One serving of Feature Kibble is currently modeled at 6 hours, or 6 person-hours. Multiply servings when the work repeats, spreads across more people, or needs another review cycle.
Warning label
May grow if left near executives.
Evidence needed
Before committing this snack, collect an owner, a reason, a time formula, a rollback or no-op alternative, and a short explanation of what the receipt does and does not prove.
How to reduce the cost
Decision Memo Patties
No-op alternative
If evidence, authority, or capacity is missing, the mature move may be to record a no-op decision and revisit when the missing ingredient exists.
What this teaches
- Scope Creep
- Acceptance Criteria
- Hidden Work
Related lesson
scope-creep
Related field report
scope-creep
Related glossary terms
Scope Creep, Acceptance Criteria, Hidden Work
Related blueprint
Decision record starter ยท Open Blueprint Gallery
Copy decision-record starter
Decision: Consider Feature KibbleTime formula: 30m clarification + 3h build + 1h review + 1h QA + 30m reworkEvidence: [link or owner] No-op alternative: [what happens if we do not act] Boundary: This is a draft for human review, not an approval. Reviewed at UTC: [timestamp]
Boundary note
This snack produces draft learning and time-burn evidence only; it does not approve fixes, validate credentials, train models, or certify safety.
Dogfooding notes
Exercises product snapshotting, time totals, TTL refresh, telemetry, learning translation, and checkout record creation.